Conclusion:Because the sentence described in this manuscript
does not have "misread prevention psychology"
It is a detrairy and it is a fake item.
Therefore it is reasonable to conclude that there is no "literal content" expected by many people.
With this one point you can refute the Voynich manuscript.
"Misreading prevention psychology" is not subjective.
Can you dispute?
***
You can predict how to make this sentence.
With this method, you can preserve regularity, individuality, linguistic relevance, etc.
***
However, similar literature does not exist in this language.
That is to say that there is a high possibility of detalamation at the same level as "Nessie".
***
Contemporary people appreciate this manuscript with ideal theory.
結論:この手稿に記述されている文章は「誤読防止心理」が無い為デタラメでありフェイクアイテムである。
従って多くの人々が期待している「文献的内容」は無いと断定するのが合理的である。
この一点のみでヴォイニッチ手稿を論破できます。
「誤読防止心理」は主観ではありません。アナタは反論できますか?
BGM:ヒカルの碁のゲーム